Comments on: Pampers takes on mommy bloggers and wins

By: mamabear

mamabear — Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:28:39 +0000

I am working very hard to contain my anger but I am about to explode. I agree that there is no evidence of diaper rash from these diapers from hell (literally) because IT IS NOT A RASH!!!!!!!!!!!! IT IS A BURN!!!!!!! I bought Pampers size 5 with dry max on Saturday 11/6/2010. By Wednesday, 11/10/10 my 18month daughter had a burn the size of a quarter in her diaper area. There was no evidence of any rash or bumps. Her bottom and other areas was as smooth as a baby’s bottom is suppose to be. I am hotter than the burn my daughter experienced from the diaper and I not only will take legal action but I am boycotting every product made by this evil corporation (I know it is a lot of products) but they will never get another penny of my money ever). Hit them where it hurts. They can’t hurt my child and turn a profit from me. These people are counting on us to be passive. But if we don’t fight and protect our children from these corporate monsters who know the products they are turning out are defective and hurting our children in the most vulnerable places, who will? What galls me the most is the denial and blame on the parents. WE are not stupid. We know our children and we know a defective and dangerous product. Join me and boycott anything and everything from proctor and gamble. Think about the pain they caused your child and it will be more than easy to do.

By: pampers

pampers — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 07:18:16 +0000

I like Pampers Diapers because I have four children. And my son is using this brand(Pampers Diapers). I really like Pampers Diapers because It has the following features.

By: renaissance chambara | Ged Carroll - Links of the day

renaissance chambara | Ged Carroll - Links of the day — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:04:23 +0000

[...] Pampers takes on mommy bloggers and wins | SMI – not a win as this is a running battle but an interesting insight into their playbook [...]

By: Suziewoos

Suziewoos — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:07:11 +0000

This is not true at all. Parents have made their own mind up. The babies are the ones that lost and Pampers have certainly not won. Its not about winning tho, It SHOULD be abour Proctor &Gamble doing the rigth thing and working out what IS triggering an extreame reaction to a small percentage of babies. Any decent company with morals would be trying to help sort this out. Instead they stil pretend its nothing to do with them (then why is it that our babies were wearing the product before it changed without any problems?). So, Parents just switch to another brand or cloth and as Pampers roll out Dry Max into ALL their nappies effecting even more babies their sales will drop even further – funny they were trying to increase the market share!

By: P&G throws more cash at the Pampers Dry Max mess | Social Media Influence

Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:11:32 +0000

[...] month, we reported that P&G’s marketing response to a mommy blogger-driven social media attack on its [...]

By: Brenda Kidd

Brenda Kidd — Mon, 31 May 2010 17:56:58 +0000

Procter & Gamble and Brenda Kidd:
Unlike Pampers, why can’t Procter & Gamble just sit down with Brenda Kidd and talk about her Actonel adverse side effects, injuries that occurred, before Procter and Gamble sold Actonel, which is a drug for osteoporosis to another company? This has been going on way to long.

By: Social Media Influence

Social Media Influence — Thu, 20 May 2010 07:37:12 +0000

Thanks for pointing that out, Huh. We’ve corrected the miscalculation and, of course, regret the error.

By: huh

huh — Thu, 20 May 2010 02:38:55 +0000

You really need to get your facts straight! You have mixed up your face book pages. The boycott pampers page has NEVER been to 2500 members! You are probably referring to the page “Pampers Bring Back the old Cruisers/Swaddlers” Their page is now past 9,000 members and GROWING. Next time do a little more research and make sure what you post is right!