http://socialmediainfluence.com/2009/02/17/facebook-tos-updates-spark-privacy-debate/ Social Media Intelligence, News & Analysis Sat, 19 May 2012 10:08:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 http://socialmediainfluence.com/2009/02/17/facebook-tos-updates-spark-privacy-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-4380 coffee Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:57:36 +0000 http://socialmediainfluence.com/?p=477#comment-4380 Sadly, most people would not have looked closely enough to notice the change in Facebook's Terms of Service... looks them social networkers are doing a good job of looking out for each other Sadly, most people would not have looked closely enough to notice the change in Facebook’s Terms of Service… looks them social networkers are doing a good job of looking out for each other

]]> http://socialmediainfluence.com/2009/02/17/facebook-tos-updates-spark-privacy-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-4365 Facebook TOS updates spark privacy debate | take a TECKnews Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:49:01 +0000 http://socialmediainfluence.com/?p=477#comment-4365 [...] post by socialmediainfluence.com and software by Elliott Back Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Last Edit: 17 Feb 2009 [...] [...] post by socialmediainfluence.com and software by Elliott Back Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Last Edit: 17 Feb 2009 [...]

]]> http://socialmediainfluence.com/2009/02/17/facebook-tos-updates-spark-privacy-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-4364 ring » Blog Archive » Facebook TOS updates spark privacy debate | socialmediainfluence.com Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:21:35 +0000 http://socialmediainfluence.com/?p=477#comment-4364 [...] Julia Stege wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptEven if the person deactivates their account, their friend still has a copy of that message. We think this is the right way for Facebook to work, and it is consistent with how other services like email work. One of the reasons we updated our terms was to make this more clear. … And that goes double on social networking sites, where–let’s be honest–people egregiously overshare and then get all righteous when it is explained to them that sharing means, um, sharing.” … [...] [...] Julia Stege wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptEven if the person deactivates their account, their friend still has a copy of that message. We think this is the right way for Facebook to work, and it is consistent with how other services like email work. One of the reasons we updated our terms was to make this more clear. … And that goes double on social networking sites, where–let’s be honest–people egregiously overshare and then get all righteous when it is explained to them that sharing means, um, sharing.” … [...]

]]>